US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,601
Webster v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv01348
Petitioner:
Jatavious Kawan Webster
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2023cv01335
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Waukesha County, Honorable Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Keith Myers
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Keith Myers
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Komanekin v. Winnebago County
as 2:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
D'Angelo Lee Komanekin
Respondent:
Winnebago County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rumsey v. Buesgen
as 2:2023cv01252
Petitioner:
Curtis James Rumsey
Respondent:
Warden Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyna Sr. v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv01240
Petitioner:
Richard Reyna Sr., Richard J Reyna, Sr and Richard Reyna, Sr
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linton v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv01180
Petitioner:
Alvin E Linton, III
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elmhdati v. Stevens
as 1:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elmhdati
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Keyes
as 2:2023cv01171
Petitioner:
James King
Respondent:
Warden RD Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
