US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 409
Honeywell International Inc. v. Research Products Corporation
as 3:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc.
Defendant:
Research Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
3M Company et al v. Thunder Finish, Ltd.
as 3:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company
Defendant:
Thunder Finish, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kaldren LLC v. La Crosse Technology, Ltd.
as 3:2017cv00661
Plaintiff:
Kaldren LLC
Defendant:
La Crosse Technology, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kaldren LLC v. Wausau Paper Corp.
as 3:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kaldren LLC
Defendant:
Wausau Paper Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kaldren LLC v. Madison Gas and Electric Company
as 3:2017cv00663
Plaintiff:
Kaldren LLC
Defendant:
Madison Gas and Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Inguran, LLC et al v. ABS Global, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00446
Plaintiff:
Inguran, LLC , Cytonome/ST, LLC and XY, LLC
Defendant:
ABS Global, Inc. , Genus PLC and Premium Genetics (UK) Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Essity Hygiene and Health Aktiebolag et al v. Cascades Canada ULC
as 3:2017cv00282
Defendant:
Cascades, Inc. and Cascades Canada ULC
Plaintiff:
SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag, Essity Hygiene and Health Aktiebolag and Essity Professional Hygiene North America LLC
Counter Defendant:
SCA Tissue North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Niazi, Imran v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Imran Niazi
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Niazi, Imran v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Imran Niazi
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Niazi, Imran v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 3:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
Imran Niazi
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
