Wisconsin Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Reidt, Amanda v. Advanced Marketing and Processing, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Amanda Reidt
Defendant:
Advanced Marketing and Processing, Inc. doing business as Protect My Car
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jennings, Susie v. Gundersen Lutheran Health System, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Susie Jennings
Defendant:
Gundersen Lutheran Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hulce v. Zipongo Inc
as 2:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
James C. Hulce
Defendant:
Zipongo, Inc. d/b/a Foodsmart
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Garrow v. Jurak World Wide, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brian Garrow
Defendant:
Jurak World Wide Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kaplan v. Capital One Bank USA NA
as 2:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Julie Kaplan
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Zoulek v. Gannett Co Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jean Zoulek
Defendant:
Gannett Co Inc and A Marketing Resource LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bross v. Batteries Plus LLC
as 1:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
Brittney Bross
Defendant:
Batteries Plus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pharm v. Kohl's Corporation
as 2:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Toni Pharm
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Graehl v. Kohls Inc
as 2:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Mary C Graehl
Defendant:
Kohls Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Workman v. HICCUPTV LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01336
Plaintiff:
Candy Workman
Defendant:
HICCUPTV LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
