Wisconsin Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Workman v. HICCUPTV LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01337
Plaintiff:
Candy Workman
Defendant:
HICCUPTV LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Van Elzen v. Advisors Ignite USA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
David Van Elzen
Defendant:
Advisors Ignite USA LLC and Steven DeJohn
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Van Elzen v. Cody Askins LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
David Van Elzen
Defendant:
Cody Askins LLC, 8 Percent Nation LLC and Cody Askins
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hayes v. BMO Harris Bank N.A.
as 2:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Cindy Hayes
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Olsen v. Eastern Account System Inc
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Ashley A Olsen
Defendant:
Eastern Account System Inc doing business as E-Center
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Olsen v. The CMI Group Inc
as 1:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Ashley A Olsen
Defendant:
The CMI Group Inc doing business as A To Z Call Center Services LP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gill v. OT Growth Partners LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Anna Gill
Defendant:
OT Growth Partners LLC and Ultimate Fitness Group LLC doing business as OrangeTheory Fitness
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brady v Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC
as 2:2022cv00187
Defendant:
Joshua Brady and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Croft v. PNC Bank National Association
as 2:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Dennis Croft
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Petro, Melodie v. Mariner Finance, LLC
as 3:2021cv00812
Plaintiff:
Melodie Petro
Defendant:
Mariner Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
