Rollins v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Mona Gail Rollins
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2007cv00770
Filed: August 27, 2007
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Henry
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 7, 2008 18 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT that the motion to remand is granted, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this action is REMANDED to the Commissioner as further set out in order. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 2/7/08. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (Furnished to: Bill Waxman and Chief Judge Thigpen)(sl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rollins v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mona Gail Rollins
Represented By: Georgia H. Ludlum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?