Truitt v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Debra M. Truitt
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2008cv00620
Filed: August 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING the 26 RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; OVERRULING the 27 Objection; AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner; DISMISSING this case with prejudice, with costs awarded to the Defendant. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 1/7/2010. (br, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Truitt v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debra M. Truitt
Represented By: Bryan Scott Blackwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?