Rhynes v. Astrue (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Andre Rhynes
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2008cv00968
Filed: December 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: M Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: M
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED AND REMANDED, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 3/17/2010. Copy also mailed to SSA Chief Judge and SSA Office of Hearings and Appeals. (wcl, ) Modified on 3/17/2010 (wcl, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhynes v. Astrue (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: David Ian Blower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre Rhynes
Represented By: Georgia Hidle Ludlum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?