Hovey v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Ronnie Harold Hovey
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2009cv00486
Filed: May 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Dothan Office
County: Henry
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; that the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this judgment on the docket as the final judgment of the court, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 12/8/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hovey v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronnie Harold Hovey
Represented By: Georgia Hidle Ludlum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?