Senne v. Astrue

Senne v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Joyce J. Senne
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2009cv00952
Filed:	October 13, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Dothan Office
County:	Dale
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 30, 2011	Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that, pursuant to the 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), (1.) The petition for attorney's fees be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent that the contingent fee amount is reduced by (a) $5,300.00 for work at the ad ministrative level; (b) $2,343.75, the amount previously awarded under the EAJA; and (c) 50% of the amount requested. Counsel be and is hereby AWARDED $3,803.30 as a reasonable attorney's fee; (2.) The Commissioner shall pay to th e plaintiff's attorney $3,803.30 of the amount previously withheld from the plaintiff's past due benefits; and (3.) The Commissioner shall pay to the plaintiff $11,447.05 of the amount previously withheld from her past due benefits. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/30/11. (scn, )
June 30, 2011	Filing 27 ORDER re plaintiff's 23 Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 406(b) and 25 Response to Motion. ORDERED that on or before 7/15/2011 the plaintiff shall file a reply to the defendant's response. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/30/2011. (dmn)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 30, 2011

Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that, pursuant to the 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), (1.) The petition for attorney's fees be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent that the contingent fee amount is reduced by (a) $5,300.00 for work at the ad ministrative level; (b) $2,343.75, the amount previously awarded under the EAJA; and (c) 50% of the amount requested. Counsel be and is hereby AWARDED $3,803.30 as a reasonable attorney's fee; (2.) The Commissioner shall pay to th e plaintiff's attorney $3,803.30 of the amount previously withheld from the plaintiff's past due benefits; and (3.) The Commissioner shall pay to the plaintiff $11,447.05 of the amount previously withheld from her past due benefits. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/30/11. (scn, )

June 30, 2011

Filing 27 ORDER re plaintiff's 23 Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 406(b) and 25 Response to Motion. ORDERED that on or before 7/15/2011 the plaintiff shall file a reply to the defendant's response. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/30/2011. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Senne v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce J. Senne
Represented By:	Quinn Eric Brock
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?