Lolley v. Hughes et al (INMATE1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 10, 2011
ORDER adopting the 10 Recommendation; dismissing the plaintiff's claims against the Houston County Jail with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); dismissing the plaintiff 's claims for monetary damages against Douglas Valeska with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); dismissing without prejudice the plaintiff's challenges to the constitutionality of his incarce ration with respect to either pending or completed criminal proceedings, in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); dismissing Houston County Jail and Douglas Valeska as defendants; referring the case, with respect to th e plaintiff's claims against defendants Andy Hughes, Jayson Smoke, and Lt. Moris regarding conditions of confinement at the Houston County Jail, back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/10/2011. (br, )
|September 20, 2011
ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/20/2011. (furn: Cashier) (wcl, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?