Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Elliott v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Bill Rafferty, Jackie Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv13013
Plaintiff:
Andy Hughes
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. White et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jon B. Carroll
Defendant:
John White, Carleton Ott, Mike Magrino and others
Movant:
Wykle Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Young v. Pulin et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00908
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Young
Defendant:
Officer Pulin, Andy Hughes, Houston County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Johnson v. Andy Hughs, et al
as 13-14971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO RASHAD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDY HUGHS, in his individual capacity, KIRSKEY, in his individual capacity and BUCHMAN, in his individual capacity
Johnson v. Hughes, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00789
Plaintiff:
Fred Johnson
Defendant:
Andy Hughes , Mark E. Choquette and Jason Smoake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis v. Hughes et al (MAG+)
as 1:2013cv00787
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ardis
Defendant:
Andy Hughes, Keith Reid and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis v. Hughes et al (MAG+)
as 1:2013cv00788
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ardis
Defendant:
Andy Hughes , Mark E. Choquette and Jason Smoake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis v. Hughes, et al. (MAG+)
as 1:2013cv00786
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ardis
Defendant:
Andy Hughes and Douglas Albert Valeska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hughes et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rashad Johnson
Defendant:
Andy Hughes, Lt. Kirskey and Sgt. Buchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
