Kramer v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
Yankton Kitt Kramer |
Houston County Jail, Donald Valenza, James Brazier, Jason Smoak, Chaplin Pickett and Mark Choquette |
1:2023cv00054 |
January 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Jerusha T Adams |
Emily C Marks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 Response to #4 Order, filed by Yankton Kitt Kramer. (tha, ) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Yankton Kitt Kramer. (hrr, ) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, filed by Yankton Kitt Kramer. (hrr, ) Modified on 1/23/2023 to correct docket text (bes, ). |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against James Brazier, Mark Choquetta, Houston County Jail, Chaplin Pickett, Jason Smoak, Donald Valenza, filed by Yankton Kitt Kramer. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Religous Diet Decision, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order to Show Cause For Preliminary Injunction)(hrr, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/23/2023 to include case number on PDF) (bes, ). Modified on 1/23/2023 (bes, ). |
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Yankton Kitt Kramer.(No PDF document attached - see docket entry #1 ). (hrr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.