Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Coplen v. Houston Co. Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2025cv00440
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chester Coplen
Defendant:
Houston Co. Jail, Cpl Creech, Cpt Asibit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanderpool v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2025cv00196
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Vanderpool
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Commander Moore, Corporal Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vanderpool v. Smoak (INMATE 2)
as 1:2025cv00187
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Vanderpool
Defendant:
Jason Smoak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Cox v. Jason Smoak, et al
as 24-14173
Defendant:
MINDY VAN ACKERN, KELITA MOORE, CATRINA BURKHALTER-MURRY and others
Plaintiff:
RAY COX
Dozier v. Smoak (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dozier
Defendant:
Jason Smoak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNealy v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Vantavious Dwight Montez McNealy
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Nurse Mindy, Nurse Evelyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bracaloni v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Noah Zachary Bracaloni
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Nurse Mindy, Nurse Evelyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackman v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Chad Allen Jackman
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, James Brazier and Mark Choquette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Smoak et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ray Cox
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Mark Choquette, Catrina Burkhalter-Murry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kramer v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Yankton Kitt Kramer
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Donald Valenza, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
