Dallas v. Allen et al (DEATH PENALTY)
| Donald Dallas |
| Grant Culliver, William H. Pryor, Jr. and Richard F. Allen |
| 2:2002cv00777 |
| July 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) Petitioner's motions to supplement the record, filed 4/1/2009 (Doc. #'s 108 & 109 ), are GRANTED; 2) Petitioner's motion for reconsideration, filed 5/25/2012 (Doc. # [12 1]), is in all respects DENIED; 3) Petitioner's motion for leave to amend, filed 1/11/2017 (Doc. # 146 ), is GRANTED; the Clerk shall file Petitioner's First Amended Petition, i.e., Doc. # 146 -1, as a separate pleading; 4) All relief req uested in Petitioner's original federal habeas corpus petition (Doc. # 1 ), as supplemented or amended by Petitioner's "amended petition" (i.e., Doc # 146 -1), is DENIED; 5) Respondent's motions to dismiss (Doc. #'s [4 ], 49 , 92 , 113 ) are DISMISSED AS MOOT; 6) All other pending motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT; 7) Petitioner is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability on all of his claims. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/14/2017. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
