Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Wright v. Bentley et al
as 6:2012cv01988
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Wright
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, Bob Riley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Price v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lewis Price
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Richard F. Allen, Willie Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeithen v. Jackson et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00190
Plaintiff:
Orlando Samuel McKeithen
Defendant:
Cathy Jackson, Juanice Cole, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Sutton v. Attorney General, State of AL, et al
as 10-15294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, RICHARD F. ALLEN and STATE DIETICIAN, for the A.D.O.C.
Young v. Riley et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00956
Plaintiff:
Jamiah Young
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King, J. C. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeNorris Williams v. Alabama DOC, et al
as 10-15121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENORRIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICHARD F. ALLEN
Sutton v. Attorney General for the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv02640
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama, Richard F. Allen and State Dietician
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Riley et al
as 2:2010cv02583
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Richard F. Allen, Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. State of Alabama, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00766
Plaintiff:
Cesar Moss
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, Arnold Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
