Ransom v. Astrue (CONSENT)

Plaintiff: James A. Ransom
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2008cv00214
Filed: March 25, 2008
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 24, 2008 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED as follows: 1) GRANTING plf's 18 Application for Attorney's Fees and Expenses to the extent that the plf be and is hereby AWARDED fees and expenses in the amount of $2,742.88; 2) DENYING 18 motion that fees be paid directly to counsel, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 12/24/2008. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ransom v. Astrue (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James A. Ransom
Represented By: Cheryl Dickey Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?