Williams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
||Willie Kevin Williams
||Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and Tanya Morris
||June 3, 2009
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Ira De Ment
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 16, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Willie Kevin Williams; it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Objections to R&R due by 6/29/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 6/16/09. (vma, )
|June 4, 2009
ORDER that on or before 6/24/09 the plaintiff shall file either the appropriate affidavit in support of his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a prison account statement from the account clerk at the BCF showing the average monthly balance in plaintiff's prison account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint and the average monthly deposits to plaintiff's account during the past six months or the $350.00 filing fee; to ai d the plaintiff in complying with this order, the Clerk is directed to furnish him with a copy of the form affidavit used by persons seeking to proceed in forma pauperis before this court;(furn: form as directed). Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 6/4/09. (vma, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?