North v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
Plaintiff:
Tillman North
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Barret, Mrs. Martin, Elmore Correction Facility, Warden Daniels, Officer Ware, Officer Lewis and Officer McClease
Case Number:
2:2010cv00300
Filed:
April 7, 2010
Court:
Alabama Middle District Court
Office:
Montgomery Office
County:
Elmore
Presiding Judge:
Truman M. Hobbs
Referring Judge:
Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit:
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2010 | 5 |
ORDER AND OPINION ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge and DISMISSING this case without prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 5/6/10. (djy, )
|
| April 12, 2010 | 3 |
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Elmore Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 4/12/2010. (br, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
