Young v. Astrue (CONSENT)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 20, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 30 petition for Attorney Fees; the commissioner shall pay to the plf's attorney $6,606.25 of the amount previously withheld from the plf's past due benefits. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/20/15. (djy, )
|July 22, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the Plaintiff's 24 motion for attorney fees be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/22/13. (scn, )
|March 29, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that this case will be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner with instructions that the Commissioner must (1) accept as true Young's subjective testimony about her menstrual pain and excessive bleeding, and her testimony as to the number of days per month that she must be absent from work due to her menstrual flow, and (2) consider, at step five of the analytical process, whether Young is disabled when all of her impairments are taken into consider ation, including those impairments that are caused by dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia; further ORDERED that, in accordance with Bergen v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 454 F.3d 1273, 1278 n. 2 (11th Cir. 2006), the plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after she receives notice of any amount of past due benefits awarded to seek attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). See also Blitch v. Astrue, 261 Fed. Appx. 241, 242 n.1 (11th Cir. 2008).. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/29/13. (Furnished to SSA Chief Judge and SSA Appeals.)(scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?