McSheridan v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
||Jason L. McSheridan
||Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee, Correctional Medical Services, Hugh Hood, D. Copeland, James Jones, Leon Bolling, Nurse Fenderson and A. Hooks
||February 13, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Charles S. Coody
||Truman M. Hobbs
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 17, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) That the state defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claims against them in their o fficial capacities be and is hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; (3) That the defendants' motions for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief be and are hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DENIED as moot; (4) That the state defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claims for damages be and is hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; (5) That the medical defendants' motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED and that the plaintiff's claims against them be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and (6) That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with costs taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on March 17, 2015. (scn, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?