Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 667
JONES v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Defendant: BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KELLY LATINI, HUMPHREY and others
Plaintiff: JAMES JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones No. 10 v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv11688
Plaintiff: James Jones No. 10
Defendant: City of Boston, Janny G Dunne, Keysteps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Tyrone Jones
as 24-11947
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TYRONE JAMES JONES
USA v. Alfred Shavers, et al
as 24-11943
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALFRED LAMAR SHAVERS and TYRONE JAMES JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00811
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Jones v. Nationwide Cargo, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: James Jones
Defendant: Nationwide Cargo, Inc. and Dustin Singhas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff: Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant: Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jones
as 24-40293
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Charlie James Jones
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?