King v. Anderson, et al (INMATE 1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 12, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs 120 motion for reconsideration of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. The courts August 4, 2014 order (Doc. # 117) is VACATED, and Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. # 115) is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 08/12/2014. (ydw, )
|July 2, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER directing that Plaintiff's motion to alter, amend, or vacate the judgment, or in the alternative, for reconsideration, (Doc. # 110 ), is DENIED; further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to label and preserve the flash drive submitted to chambers as Exhibits E and N to Plaintiff's Documents 101 and 102 . Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/2/14. (scn, )
|June 2, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. # 96 , 99 ) are GRANTED, as further set out. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/2/14. (scn, )
|March 22, 2012
ORDER directing that: (1.) The plaintiff's 14 objection to the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2.) The 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3.) The 1 motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff is DENIED; (4.) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 3/22/12. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?