Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Rhodes v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Alan Rhodes
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Henry Lambert, Clay County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Shianna et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Markus OShea Payne
Defendant:
Shianna, Brittany, Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carden v. Gurley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Dr. Gurley and Mike Mull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherch v. Terry et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cherch
Defendant:
Nurse Terry, Dr. Gurley and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. Gurley et al
as 1:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
James Brandon Spears
Defendant:
Dr. Gurley and Jimmy Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Gurley et al
as 1:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Chris Jackson
Defendant:
Dr. Gurley, Alex Evans, Kim Artwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Highfield v. Greene et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv02002
Defendant:
Officer John, Officer Mike, Nurse Tracy and others
Plaintiff:
Hollis Barry Highfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Highfield v. Greene et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00880
Defendant:
Officer John, Officer Mike, Nurse Tracy and others
Plaintiff:
Hollis Barry Highfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00918
Defendant:
Susan Moncrief, Robert Henline, Bill Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscol v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00882
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Driscol
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Nurse Duramus, Dr. Gurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
