Jowers v. Wynne et al
| Rosslon Jowers |
| William W. Wynne, Jr. and Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles |
| 2:2012cv00423 |
| May 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Morgan |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER that: (1) By agreement of the parties, the name of defendant William T. Wynn, Jr. (who is sued in his official capacity only) is corrected to read William W. Wynne, Jr. The docket sheet is corrected to reflect the same. (2) Defendants State o f Alabama and Wynne's, motion to dismiss 9 is granted as set out in order. (3) By agreement of the parties, the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles is substituted for the State of Alabama as the defendant on plaintiff Jowers's Title VI I claims. The State of Alabama is thus terminated as a party in this case. (4) The motion to dismiss 9 is denied in all other respects; that the only remaining claims and parties are: (1) the race and sex discrimination claims against defendant Al abama Board of Pardons and Paroles under Title VII and (2) the race and sex discrimination claims against defendant Wynne seeking injunctive relief under § 1983 (the statutory enforcement provision for the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment). Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/15/2012. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
