Johnson v. United States Postal Service et al (INMATE 3)
| David Lamar Johnson |
| L.R. Heath, Dennis L. Collins, United States Postal Inspector (Clayton), United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service Clayton, Alabama, Marsha Freso and United States Postal Inspector (Atlanta Division) |
| 2:2012cv01032 |
| November 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Barbour |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Wallace Capel |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the plaintiff's 12 Objection is overruled; (2) the 11 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 10/16/13. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, filed by David Lamar Johnson. It is ORDERED that the 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. It is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr. on 8/9/2013. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
