Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Johnson v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Gary Ray Maxwell, State of Alabama, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Marshall
as 5:2019cv00836
Respondent:
Steve Marshall
Petitioner:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Head et al
as 5:2019cv00722
Defendant:
Glen Ray Smith, Eddie Davis, Lyn Head and others
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Marshall
as 5:2018cv02020
Respondent:
Steve Marshall
Petitioner:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
David Johnson v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 13-14976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE CLAYTON, ALABAMA, U.S. POSTAL INSPECTOR, (Clayton) in their individual and official capacity and others
David Johnson v. Kenneth Sconyers, et al
as 13-14865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH SCONYERS, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, SHERRY LIGHTNER, Ms., Classification Coordinator, in her individual and official capacity, J. CAFFIE, Ms., Classification Specialist, in her individual and official capacity and others
In re: David Johnson
as 13-14566
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID LAMAR JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Johnson v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Carla Jones, Shawn C. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Sherry Lightner, J. Caffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
