Riddle v. Graham et al
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Riddle, III
Defendant:
Jackie Graham, Joanne Randolph, Joe N. Dickson, N. Gunter Guy, Jr., The Personnel Board of the State of Alabama, John Carroll, Faye Nelson and Jon D. Barganier
Case Number:
2:2013cv00110
Filed:
February 20, 2013
Court:
Alabama Middle District Court
Office:
Montgomery Office
County:
Montgomery
Referring Judge:
Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge:
William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:
42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| January 20, 2015 | 61 |
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) Commissioner Guy's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 43 ) on Mr. Riddle's federal-law claims is GRANTED; (2) Mr. Riddle's federal-law due process and equal protection claims, set out in Count II of the complaint, are DISMISSED with prejudice; and (3) The pending state-law claims set out in Counts I, II, and III, and Defendants' pending motions for summary judgment on the same, are REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the remand. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/20/15. (scn, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
