Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Anthony Green, et al v. Jackie Graham, et al
as 17-14704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY L. GREEN, BROOKE M. WALKER and EARL E. HOWTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
JACKIE GRAHAM, (Individual Capacity DISMISSED PER [40] ORDER) and official capacity as Director of the State of Alabama Personnel Department and HAL TAYLOR, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Law Enforcement for the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GRAHAM v. CONNELLY, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04028
Plaintiff:
JACKIE GRAHAM
Defendant:
CONNELLY, LLC and ADP TOTALSOURCE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Graham et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-14348
Plaintiff:
Camilla Graham and Jackie Graham
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Graham et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv14348
Plaintiff:
Camilla Graham and Jackie Graham
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Thomas, Michael Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
