Mosley v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 1)
||Fredrick Benard Mosley
||Kenneth Sconyers, Cpt. Strickland, Mrs. Mosley, Nathaniel Lawson, Lt. Woods, Shawn Logan, CO Dennis, CO I Liptrott, K. Brooks, Ms. Bowen and Rodney Wilson
||July 25, 2013
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||W. Harold Albritton
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 12, 2013
ORDER that the 17 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiffs request for criminal prosecution of the defendants under eitherfederal or state law is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. 167; 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. The plaintiffs claim regarding an alleged civil conspiracy is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 4. The claim that defendant Sconyers taunted him is DISMISSED with prej udice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 5. Commissioner Mosley, Shawn Logan and Officer Dennis are dismissed as defendants in this cause of action; and 6. This case, with respect to the plaintiffs excessive force and improper fingerprinting cl aims against Capt. Strickland, Officer Liptrot, Officer Rodney Wilson, Capt. Nathaniel Lawson, Lt. Woods, and Officer K. Brooks, his failure to protect claim against Warden Kenneth Sconyers, and the denial of medical treatment claim against Nurse Bowen,are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/12/2013. (dmn, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?