Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Taylor v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00942
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Officer Cookie, J. Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Stephone D. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00756
Defendant:
Jennifer McCovery, Jesse Stanford, J. Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Lorenzo Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00688
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Bryan Gavins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Tyree Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Jennifer McCovery, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Duane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Jennifer McCovery, Jesse Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rodriquez Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudd v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Sgt. Thompkins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Ray Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Sgt. Spann, Anthony Crittenden, CO Key and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sirvoy Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judkins v. Lawson (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00479
Plaintiff:
Kertavis Wayne Judkins
Defendant:
Nathaniel Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Lawson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Lt. McCovery, John Pryor, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sirvoy Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick Mosley v. Angela Wilson, et al
as 16-17137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDRICK BENARD MOSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA WILSON, CATHY BROWN, Nurse, NATHANIEL LAWSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
