Burton et al v. President Pro Tempore Senators et al (INMATE 2)
| Morgan Jerome Burton, Jr. |
| Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles, Luther Strange, Chief Justice Judges and President Pro Tempore Senators |
| 2:2013cv00680 |
| September 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Bibb |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER AND OPINION directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby AD OPTED and that: (1) The claims presented by Plaintiff under the Federal Tort Claims Act are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (2) Plaintiff's challenges to the constitutionality of his conviction(s) a nd resulting incarceration are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as these claims are not properly brought before the court in this cause of action; (3) This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/5/14. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
