Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al

Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al

Plaintiff:	Roy S. Moore
Defendant:	Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama, Billy C. Bedsole, David Scott, Randall L. Cole, Craig S. Pittman, David Thrasher, Ralph D. Malone, Augusta S. Dowd, Kim J. Chaney, David A. Kimberley, Luther Strange and Lyn Stuart
Case Number:	2:2016cv00388
Filed:	May 27, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	Gray M. Borden
Presiding Judge:	W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 4, 2016	Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. In view of the Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal of Attorney General Luther Strange (Doc. # 39 ), the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 31 ) is DENIED as moot and Defendant Luther Strange i s DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Motion for Leave to file Under Seal Unredacted "Secret Precedent" Cited by Defendants (Doc. # 43 ) is DENIED as moot. 3. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 32 ) is GRANTED to the extent that the court finds, for the reasons outlined, that abstention is appropriate in this case. The Verified Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 2 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/4/2016.(kh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 4, 2016

Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. In view of the Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal of Attorney General Luther Strange (Doc. # 39 ), the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 31 ) is DENIED as moot and Defendant Luther Strange i s DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Motion for Leave to file Under Seal Unredacted "Secret Precedent" Cited by Defendants (Doc. # 43 ) is DENIED as moot. 3. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 32 ) is GRANTED to the extent that the court finds, for the reasons outlined, that abstention is appropriate in this case. The Verified Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 2 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/4/2016.(kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy S. Moore
Represented By:	Phillip Leo Jauregui
Represented By:	Horatio G. Mihet
Represented By:	Mathew D. Staver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Billy C. Bedsole
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David Scott
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Randall L. Cole
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Craig S. Pittman
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David Thrasher
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ralph D. Malone
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Augusta S. Dowd
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kim J. Chaney
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David A. Kimberley
Represented By:	Samuel Holley Franklin
Represented By:	Robert Ashby Pate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Luther Strange
Represented By:	James William Davis
Represented By:	William G. Parker, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lyn Stuart
Represented By:	James William Davis
Represented By:	William G. Parker, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?