Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Parker v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00442
Plaintiff:
Tom Parker
Defendant:
Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama , Billy C. Bedsole , David Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roy S. Moore
Defendant:
Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama , Billy C. Bedsole , David Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thrasher et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv20436
Plaintiff:
Alma Thrasher and David Thrasher
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Thrasher v. Missouri Dept. of Correction
as 13-2765
Petitioner - Appellant:
David Thrasher
Respondent - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Thrasher v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 4:2013cv00595
Plaintiff:
David Thrasher
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Thrasher v. State of Missouri
as 13-1238
Petitioner - Appellant:
David Thrasher
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Missouri
David Thrasher v. Missouri Dept. of Correction
as 12-3748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Thrasher
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01828
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thrasher v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 4:2012cv01827
Plaintiff:
David Thrasher
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Thrasher v. William Suter
as 11-5227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Thrasher
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Federal Agent, United States Supreme Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
