Thompson et al v. State of Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
| Treva Thompson, Melissa Swetnam, Antwoine Giles, Anna Reynolds, Laura Corley, Larry Joe Newby, Mario Dion Yow, Jennifer Zimmer, Timothy Lanier, Pamela King and Greater Birmingham Ministries |
| State of Alabama, John H. Merrill, George Noblin and Clifford Walker |
| 2:2016cv00783 |
| September 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Madison |
| Charles S. Coody |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
286
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The Dfts' 258 motion to exclude is DENIED; 2) The Plfs' 259 motion to exclude is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 3) The Dfts' 264 evidentiary objections are SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part; 4) The Dfts' 257 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 5) The Plfs' 260 motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED; 6) The Plfs' 285 motion to clarify and continue is DENIED as moot; A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/3/2020. (bes, )
|
|
Filing
253
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that the Objection (doc. 245 ) is OVERRULED. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/17/2020. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing
225
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying the 215 motion for preliminary injunction, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 6/29/2020. (bes, )
|
|
Filing
224
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that the 205 Objections are OVERRULED, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 6/26/2020. (bes, )
|
|
Filing
212
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that the Objections (doc. 201 ) are OVERRULED. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/19/2020. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing
194
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The 106 Motion for Class Certification is DENIED; 2) The 165 Motion for Status Conference is DENIED as moot, the Court having ruled on the pending motions. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 01/24/2020. (bes, )
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER granting 185 Motion for Leave to Amend Answers to Original Complaint and Supplemental Complaint; The Dfts are given until 12/31/2019 to file as an amended answer the attachment to their motion. (Doc. 185 -1). Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/19/2019.(bes, )
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The renewed motion to dismiss (Doc. 95 ) is DENIED. 2) The motion to dismiss supplemental complaint (Doc. 95 ) is GRANTED as to Plfs Antoine Giles and Laura Corley and the claims of those Plfs are DISMISSED as moot. 3) The motion to dismiss supplemental complaint (Doc. 95 ) is GRANTED as to the State of Alabama, and the State of Alabama is DISMISSED as a party in this case. 4) The motion to dismiss supplemental complaint (D oc. 95 ) is GRANTED as to the claim in count 18 relating to the Federal Form and that claim is DISMISSED as moot. 5) The motion to dismiss supplemental complaint (Doc. 95 ) is DENIED in all other aspects, as is the alternative motion for summary ju dgment (Doc. 95 ), and the cross-motion for summary judgment on count 18 (Doc. 97 ). 6) The motion to strike untimely declaration (Doc. 109 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/3/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cnw, )
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: To summarize the more-than-nine-thousand words preceding this section in a single thirty-six-word sentence: Plaintiffs challenge to Alabamas constitutional and statutory scheme for the disenfranchisement and re-enfra nchisement of individuals convicted of crimes of moral turpitude will proceed, but only on a third of the counts in Plaintiffs fifteen-count complaint. Consistent with the reasoning of this opinion, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Counts 3, 4, 5, 14, and 15 are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (2) Counts 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. This action proceeds as to five counts: Pla intiffs claims that section 177(b) of the Alabama Constitution is racially discriminatory in violation of the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause and the Fifteenth Amendment (Counts 1 and 2); Plaintiffs claim that section 177(b) is an ex post facto law that retroactively punishes citizens (Count 11); Plaintiffs claim that section 177(b) violates the Eighth Amendments proscription against cruel and unusual punishment (Count 12); and Plaintiffs claim that section 15-22-36.1(a)(3) of the Alabama Code violates the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause (Count 13). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/26/2017. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, based upon careful consideration of Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction, Defendants opposition, the evidentiary hearing, and the oral arguments, and the record, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 56 ) is DENIED as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/28/2017. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
