Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The National Federation of the Blind of Alabama et al v. Merrill
as 2:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
The National Federation of the Blind of Alabama, Gail Smith, Jill Rossiter and others
Defendant:
John H Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Sanders v. Merrill (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jarmal Jabbar Sanders
Defendant:
John H. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Merrill
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Greater Birmingham Ministries
Defendant:
John H. Merrill
Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Merrill
as 2:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Greater Birmingham Ministries
Defendant:
John H Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Farmer v. Steen et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Neal Clifton Farmer
Defendant:
Sonny J Steen, AJC Properties LLC and John H Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Caster et al v. Merrill
as 2:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Marcus Caster, Lakeisha Chestnut, Bobby Lee DeBouse and others
Defendant:
John H Merrill, Jim McClendon and Chris Pringle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Thomas et al v. Merrill et al
as 2:2021cv01531
Plaintiff:
James Thomas, Laquisha Chandler, Khadidah Stone and others
Defendant:
John H. Merrill, Jim McClendon and Chris Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Caster et al v. Merrill
as 2:2021cv00751
Plaintiff:
Marcus Caster, LaKeisha Chestnut, Bobby Lee DeBouse and others
Defendant:
John H. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Singleton et al v. Merrill
as 2:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
Bobby Singleton, Rodger Smitherman, Eddie Billingsley and others
Defendant:
John H Merrill, Jim McClendon and Chris Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
