Wadsworth v. Franklin et al (INMATE 1)
| Jesse Wadsworth |
| Mike Henline, Phil Eastes and Bill Franklin |
| 2:2018cv00895 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Charles S Coody |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 12/26/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/12/18. (djy, ) |
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Copy of #12 & #13 orders sent to Jesse Wadsworth returned in mail with the following U S Postal Service notation, "Returned to sender-not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward". (NO PDF document attached to this notice). (djy, ) |
Filing 13
ORDER ON MOTION that the #8 MOTION for Extension of Time be and is hereby DENIED as moot since no response to the complaint is presently due from the defs, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/28/18. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER directing that on or before 12/10/2018 plf shall SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the orders of this court and his failure to adequately prosecute this action, as further set out in order; further ORDERING that the defs shall file no response to the complaint unless and until further order of the court. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/28/18. (djy, ) Modified on 11/28/2018 to clarify text to include directive to defendants (qc/djy, ).
|
| Filing 11 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Mike Henline. (Eley, Landon) |
| Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Bill Franklin. (Eley, Landon) |
| Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Phil Eastes. (Eley, Landon) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer re #4 Order to file special report within 40 days of the date of this order, by Phil Eastes, Bill Franklin, Mike Henline. (Eley, Landon) |
| Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of complaint & order of procedure signed by (illegible) for Mike Henline served on 10/24/2018, answer due 12/4/2018. (djy, ) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of complaint & order of procedure signed by (illegible) for Phil Eastes served on 10/24/2018, answer due 12/4/2018. (djy, ) |
| Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of complaint & order of procedure signed by (illegible) for Bill Franklin served on 10/24/2018, answer due 12/4/2018. (djy, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT and ANSWER on or before 12/4/2018, as further set out in order; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with complaint to named defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/22/18. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON MOTION granting #2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until $350.00 fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Elmore County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/22/18. Furnished to cashier. (djy, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Jesse Wadsworth. (beh, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Phil Eastes, Bill Franklin, Mike Henline, filed by Jesse Wadsworth.(beh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
