Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jerido v. Henline et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Ranier Daramus, James Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Jerido v. Mike Henline, et al
as 22-12337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO ORLANDER JERIDO
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE HENLINE, Warden, in his individual capacity, T. MCDOWELL, Officer, in his individual capacity, JAMES M. NORMAN, Nurse, in his individual capacity and others
Marshall v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00405
Defendant:
Mike Henline and Officer McDowell
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerido v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Officer Evans, James Norman, T. McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadsworth v. Franklin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00937
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Phil Eastes and Bill Franklin
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wadsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00942
Defendant:
Janet Davidson, Sibley G. Reynolds, Randall Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Dwone Carnell Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadsworth v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00932
Defendant:
Mike Henline and Bill Franklin
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wadsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadsworth v. Franklin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00895
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Phil Eastes and Bill Franklin
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wadsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscol v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00882
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Driscol
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Nurse Duramus, Dr. Gurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00881
Defendant:
Nurse Deramus, Officer Prayter, Bill Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Floyd Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
