Cornley v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
| Enrico Cornley |
| Karla Jones and Steven T. Marshall |
| 2:2018cv01007 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Gray M Borden |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #10 MOTION for Extension of Time; further ORDERED that the petitioner be GRANTED an extension from 1/16/2019, to and including 2/4/2019, to show cause why his 2254 petition should not be dismissed because it was not filed within the one-year limitation period in 28 USC 2244(d) and for the other reasons asserted by the respondents in their answer. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 1/28/2019. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time by Enrico Cornley. (wcl, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Cornley why his 2254 petition should not be dismissed as it was not filed within the one-year limitation period in 28 USC 2244(d) and for the other reasons asserted by the respondents; Show Cause Response due by 1/16/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/27/2018. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 8 Respondents' RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Karla Jones, Steven T. Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Jury Verdict, #2 Exhibit 2 - Sentencing Order, #3 Exhibit 3 - Appellant's Brief in CR-14-1653, #4 Exhibit 4 - Appellee's Brief in CR-14-1653, #5 Exhibit 5 - Memo opinion in CR-14-1653, #6 Exhibit 6 - Application for rehearing in CR-14-1653, #7 Exhibit 7 - Order overruling application for rehearing in CR-14-1653, #8 Exhibit 8 - Cert petition in 1151143, #9 Exhibit 9 - Order denying cert petition in 1151143, #10 Exhibit 10 - COJ in CR-14-1653, #11 Exhibit 11 - Record on appeal in CR-17-0219, #12 Exhibit 12 - Appellant's brief in CR-17-0219, #13 Exhibit 13 - Appellee's brief in CR-17-17-0219, #14 Exhibit 14 - Memo opinion in CR-17-0219, #15 Exhibit 15 - Application for rehearing in CR-17-0219, #16 Exhibit 16 - Order overruling application for rehering in CR-17-0219, #17 Exhibit 17 - Cert petition in 170653, #18 Exhibit 18 - Order denying cert petition in 1170653, #19 Exhibit 19 - COJ in CR-17-0219)(Starrett, Marc) Modified on 12/19/2018 to add the link to the #1 petition and to clarify the docket text (wcl, ). |
| Filing 7 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Karla Jones, Steven T. Marshall. (Starrett, Marc) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Petition and #4 Order signed by J. Taylor for Steven T. Marshall served on 12/5/2018, answer due 12/27/2018. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Alan Starrett on behalf of Karla Jones, Steven T. Marshall (Starrett, Marc) |
| AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Karla Jones, Steven T. Marshall. (dmn, ) (no pdf) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO ANSWER habeas petition on or before 12/27/2018; Copy mailed to petitioner; mailed CMRRR w/copies of petition to Warden Karla Jones & Attorney General for the State of Alabama. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/3/2018. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/3/2018. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Enrico Cornley. (es, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Enrico Cornley.(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
