Cases 1 - 10 of 402
McLeod v. Alabama, State of et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2025cv00062
Plaintiff:
Alexander J. McLeod
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benison v. Marshall
as 7:2025cv00010
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Benison
Defendant:
Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burton v. Marshall
as 4:2024cv01263
Petitioner:
Gary Allen Burton
Respondent:
Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodgett v. Babers et al (INMATE4)
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Benny Lee Woodgett
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burton
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Carol Boone, Judge Phil K Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00518
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Gwendolyn Babers
Plaintiff:
Troy Antwoan Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Marshal et al
as 1:2024cv00929
Defendant:
Stacey Lopez, Steve Lopez, Steven T. Marshal and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Terry Raybon and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Dale Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askew v. Mckee et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00370
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Charles McKee
Plaintiff:
Brian Denare Askew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv00826
Defendant:
Steven D Giddens, Jimmy Kilgore, Jeb Fannin and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
