Cotton v. Nieves et al (INMATE 2)
| Larry Cotton |
| P. Myers, Sgt Jordan, C. Hicks, Lt. Walker, Captain Harris, Michael Strickland, Karla Jones, Sgt Knight, Captain Drake, Sgt. Cooper, Lt. Calhoun, Lt Nieves and Assistant Warden Evans |
| 2:2019cv00359 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Charles S Coody |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $3.83 be paid on or before 6/14/2019; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Ventress CF. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/24/2019. (Furn: Cashier) (kr, )
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Larry Cotton. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 1
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Lt. Calhoun, Sgt. Cooper, Captain Drake, Assistant Warden Evans, Captain Harris, C. Hicks, Karla Jones, Sgt Jordan, Sgt Knight, P. Myers, Lt Nieves, Michael Strickland, Lt. Walker, filed by Larry Cotton.(bes, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
