Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Robinson v. Lonnie Butler, et al
as 22-3510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LONNIE BUTLER, Ohio State Patrol Officer, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, ODRC Director and others
Smith v. Harris
as 5:2021ct03252
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Shaakim Smith
Defendant:
Captain Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Butler, et al
as 2:2021cv00774
Defendant:
Patterson, Lt Ross, Officer Stout and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laseter v. Ventress Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00550
Defendant:
Capt. Emberton, Lt. Lassiter, The State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Monroe Laseter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00800
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cotton v. Nieves et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00359
Defendant:
P. Myers, Sgt Jordan, C. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medley v. Captain Harris et al
as 1:2019cv20197
Defendant:
Warden and Captain Harris
Plaintiff:
Andrew LeeAllen Medley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Walker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant:
Lt. Walker, C.O. Dennis, Captain Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
