Bartram v. Woods (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Daniel Christop Bartram
Defendant: Walter Woods and United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv00475
Filed: July 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Charles S Coody
Referring Judge: Myron H Thompson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT, upon consideration of petitioners #3 Motion to Withdraw, which the court construes a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), it is ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/19/19. (Attachments: #1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
July 16, 2019 Motion to withdraw construed as a NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Daniel Christop Bartram (NO PDF document attached to this notice-See Docket entry #3 ). (djy, )
July 16, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) by Daniel Christop Bartram. (djy, )
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The instant #1 petition be construed as a motion to vacate under 28 USC 2255; 2) The United States of America shall henceforth be listed as the sole respondent; 3) On or before 7/23/2019, Bartram shall inform the court if he wishes to do one of the following: a) Continue to proceed only on the claims he presents in the construed 2255 motion; or b) Amend the construed 2255 motion to assert any additional claims he wishes to assert under 2255 in challenging his conviction and sentence; or c) Withdraw the construed 2255 motion and dismiss this action. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/9/2019. (alm, )
July 3, 2019 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Daniel Christop Bartram, as CONSTRUED in the Court's #2 Order. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 for PDF) (alm, )
July 3, 2019 Filing 1 (CONSTRUED AS A 2255 MOTION, PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #2 ORDER) PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Daniel Christop Bartram. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(es, ) Modified on 7/9/2019 (alm, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartram v. Woods (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Christop Bartram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?