Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Walter Woods v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06773
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51767
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51566
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro-Gonzalez v. Brewer et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Walter Wood, Diane Rogers, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Castro-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgerson v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00912
Defendant:
Jeffrey Keller, Walter Woods, Demetrius Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
James Ivory Edgerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daley v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00881
Defendant:
Walter Wood, Hugh Hurwitz, Demetrius Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Bradford Lamar Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. FOLEY et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
SC/O POWELL, SC/O MANDERA, SC/O ACEBO and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOODS, THADDEUS THOMAS and MATTHEW SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whaley v. Wood (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Walter Wood and Walter J. Wood, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Kennon W. Whaley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bowman v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2019cv05252
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bowman
Defendant:
United States of America and Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Becerra v. Woods (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00900
Plaintiff:
Carlos Becerra
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
