Perez v. Woods (INMATE 3)
| Matthew Paul Perez |
| Walter Woods |
| 2:2019cv00779 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Wallace Capel |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure of Plaintiff to file necessary financial information as ordered by this court. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 11/18/2019. (kh, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER that on or before 11/4/2019, Plaintiff shall file either the $400.00 filing/administrative fees or an appropriate affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by relevant financial information from the inmate account clerk at Montgomery Federal Prison Camp. To aid Plaintiff in complying with this order, the CLERK is DIRECTED to furnish him with a copy of the form affidavit used by persons seeking to proceed in forma pauperis before this court. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall immediately inform the court and the defendant or, if counsel has appeared on behalf of the defendant, counsel of record of any change in his address. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 10/18/2019. Copy with IFP form mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: On 10/11/2019, the petitioner, an inmate confined at the Maxwell Federal Prison Camp, filed a document styled as an #1 Application for Habeas Corpus" and the Clerk therefore input this case as a 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, a thorough review of the petition establishes that the petition seeks relief for alleged "emergency medical treatment deficiencies, which have life threatening possibilities." It is ORDERED that the instant case be construed as a Bivens-type civil action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief for an alleged violation of the inmate-plaintiff's constitutional rights a federal official. The Clerk is DIRECTED to undertake any action necessary to change the nature of this to a Bivens prisoner civil rights action. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 10/17/2019. (dmn, )
|
| Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Walter Woods, filed by Matthew Paul Perez.(dmn, ) (NO IFP/NO FILING FEE) Modified on 10/17/2019 to correct file date and include No IFP/No Filing Fee text. (dmn, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Matthew Paul Perez. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perez v. Woods (INMATE 3) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Paul Perez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walter Woods | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
