Cole v. Woods (INMATE 2)
Plaintiff: Cecil Cole
Defendant: Walter Woods
Case Number: 2:2019cv00788
Filed: October 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Andrew L Brasher
Referring Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2019 Filing 11 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Walter Woods. (DuBois, James)
December 2, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Response by Walter Woods. (DuBois, James)
December 2, 2019 AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Walter Woods. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
November 19, 2019 Filing 9 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Petition, & #4 Order signed by Emily Sase for U.S. Attorney General, served on 11/14/2019. (amf, )
November 18, 2019 Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #4 Order signed by Juan Cuevas for Walter Woods, served on 11/13/2019. (kr, ) Modified on 11/20/2019 to include the date served (amf, ).
November 14, 2019 Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #4 Order signed by Jordan Johnson for U.S. Attorney served on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/2/2019 for Walter Woods. (amf, )
November 13, 2019 Filing 7 Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 4602055668. (amf, )
November 8, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Warden Walter Woods, U.S. Attorney, & U.S. Attorney General; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Petition & #4 Order. (amf, )
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO ANSWER habeas petition on or before 12/2/2019; Copy mailed to petitioner; mailed CMRRR with summons & #1 petition to Warden Walter Woods, the U.S. Attorney, and the U.S. Attorney General. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/8/2019. (amf, )
November 7, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Payment by Cecil Cole. (amf, )
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDERED that on or November 1, 2019, Petitioner shall file either the $5.00 filing fee or an affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by relevant financial information from the inmate account clerk. Petitioner is cautioned that his failure to comply with this order will result in a Recommendation that this matter be dismissed. The Clerk is DIRECTED to furnish Petitioner with a form for use in requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/18/2019. (kh, )
October 16, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Cecil Cole. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(es, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cole v. Woods (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter Woods
Represented By: James Joseph DuBois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecil Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?