Medina v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Carlos Medina
Defendant: Walter J. Wood, Sr. and United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv01085
Filed: December 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: W Harold Albritton
Referring Judge: Charles S Coody
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2020 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that Medina's petition, construed as a 2255 Motion, be DISMISSED, because this court is without jurisdiction to consider Medina's challenge to his conviction and sentence entered by United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the interest of justice does not warrant a 1631 transfer to that court; Objections to R&R due by 3/12/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/27/2020. (djy, )
January 23, 2020 Filing 4 Response to #3 Order by Carlos Medina. (djy, )
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing that: (1) the instant petition be construed as a motion to vacate under 28 USC 2255; (2) the United States of America shall henceforth be listed as the sole respondent in this case; (3) on or before 1/22/2020, Medina shall inform the court is he wishes to to one of the following: (a) Continue to proceed only on the claims he presents in the construed 2255 motion; or (b) Amend the construed 2255 motion to assert any additional claims he wishes to assert under 2255 in challenging his conviction and sentence; or (c) Withdraw the construed 2255 motion and dismiss this action, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/7/2020. (djy, )
December 30, 2019 Petition construed as a MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Carlos Medina pursuant to #3 order. (NO PDF document attached to this notice-See Docket entry #2 ).(djy, )
December 30, 2019 Filing 2 PETITION (APPLICATION) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Carlos Medina.(djy, )
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Copy of ORDER entered in 2:19cv1078-WHA directing the clerk to open a separate civil action for each inmate listed as a petitioner and place a copy of the "Application of Habeas Corpus" in each newly opened case. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/30/2019. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter J. Wood, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?