Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, A W E. Villareal, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Sonya Thompson, CMC Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castro-Gonzalez v. Brewer et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Walter Wood, Diane Rogers, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Castro-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Jeffery Keller, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldissi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
Matt Aldissi and Mahmoud Aldissi
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, Alan Cohen, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Votrobek v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00823
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, David Brewer, Jeffrey Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Votrobek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rand v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, David Brewer, Jeffrey Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Rand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kishchenko v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 4:2020cv00898
Defendant:
Staff Attorneys, United States of America and Walter J. Wood, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Sergei Kishchenko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sarcona v. Wood (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00001
Plaintiff:
Frank Sarcona
Defendant:
Walter J. Wood, Sr. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
