Becerra v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Carlos Becerra
Defendant: Walter J. Wood, Sr. and United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv01086
Filed: December 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Charles S Coody
Referring Judge: Myron H Thompson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DISMISSAL ORDER: Upon consideration of petitioner's motion to withdraw and dismiss (doc. no. #4 ), which the court construes as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), it is ORDERED that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice, with no costs taxed. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/18/2020. (kh, )
February 3, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw and Dismiss by Carlos Becerra. (kh, )
January 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The instant petition be construed as a motion to vacate under 28 USC 2255; 2) The United States of America shall henceforth be listed as the sole respondent in this case; 3) On or before 01/31/2020, Becerra shall inform the court if he wishes to do one of the following: (a) Continue to proceed only on the claims he presents in the construed 2255 motion; or (b) Amend the construed 2255 motion to assert any additional claims he wishes to assert under 2255 in challenging his conviction and sentence; or (c) Withdraw the construed 2255 motion and dismiss this action, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/17/2020. (wcl, )
December 30, 2019 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Carlos Becerra, as construed in the court's #3 Order. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #2 for pdf)(wcl, )
December 30, 2019 Filing 2 (CONSTRUED TO BE A 2255 MOTION PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #3 ORDER) APPLICATION of Habeas Corpus, filed by Carlos Becerra. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(amf, ) Modified on 1/17/2020 (wcl, ).
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER: DIRECTING the Clerk to open a separate civil action for each inmate listed as a petitioner in this case and place a copy of the "Application of Habeas Corpus" in each newly opened case. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/30/2019. (amf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Becerra v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Becerra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter J. Wood, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?