Lucas v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
| Charles Edward Lucas |
| Jefferson S. Dunn, Reosha Butler and Kay Ivey |
| 2:2020cv00650 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 11/6/2020 Plf shall file an amended complaint, as further set out in order; the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide him with a copy of the form used by prisoners to file 1983 complaints, as further set out in order; the amended complaint will supersede the original complaint. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/23/2020. (form mailed as directed)(cwl, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Recommendation entered on 10/13/2020 (Doc. #5 ) be and is hereby WITHDRAWN. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/23/2020. (cwl, )
|
| Filing 6 Initial Partial Filing fee received: Filing fee: $ 11.67, receipt number 4602059897 (cwl, ) |
|
Filing 5
(WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #7 ORDER) RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure of the plf to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by this court and any pending motion be denied; Objections to R&R due by 10/27/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/13/2020. (cwl, ) Modified on 10/23/2020 (cwl, ).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON MOTION: granting #3 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $11.67 be paid on or before 9/22/2020; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at the Ventress Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/2/2020. (furn: cashier) (cwl, )
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Charles Edward Lucas. (cwl, ) |
| Filing 2 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey, filed by Charles Edward Lucas. (Attachments: #1 Appendix E, #2 Appendix F)(cwl, ) |
|
Filing 1
Copy of ORDER entered in 2:20-cv-00625-RAH: it is ORDERED that this case proceed with Girlis Hugh Serratt as the sole plf; DIRECTING the Clerk to: 1) Open a separate civil action for each of the other inmates who signed the complaint; 2) Strike the in forma pauperis applications filed by all inmates other than inmate Girlis Hugh Serratt from the file in this case; 3) Place a copy of the complaint and the particular in forma pauperis application filed by the inmate whose name in which the new case is opened in the newly opened case; 4) Assign each newly opened case to a District Judge and Magistrate Judge in the normal docketing process. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/1/2020. (cwl, )
|
| MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Charles Edward Lucas. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #2 for pdf) (cwl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Charles Edward Lucas. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #2 for pdf) (cwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
