Tarrance v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Quindarrius Tarrance
Defendant: John Crow, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Case Number: 2:2022cv00402
Filed: July 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: W Harold Albritton
Referring Judge: Kelly F Pate
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Correction re #5 Order, which is hereby STRICKEN as an erroneous docket entry, the document was entered in the wrong case. (es, )
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 (STRICKEN AS ERRONEOUS DOCKET ENTRY - ENTERED IN WRONG CASE) ORDER (es, ) Modified on 8/24/2022 (es, ). (Main Document 5 replaced on 8/24/2022) (es, ).
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice because Tarrance has failed to comply with the Court's order that he submit either a copy of his prison account statement or the $5.00 filing fee; Objections to R&R due by 9/7/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 8/24/2022. (es, )
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 8/3/2022, Petitioner must either (1) provide the Court with a copy of his prison account statement from the account clerk at the Kilby Correctional Facility containing the account clerk's certified statement of the balance in Petitioner's prison account when he filed his 2254 petition or (2) submit the $5.00 filing fee for a habeas corpus action; Petitioner is cautioned that his failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 7/20/2022. (es, )
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Quindarrius Tarrance. (hrs, )
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Quindarrius Tarrance. (hrs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tarrance v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quindarrius Tarrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Crow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven T. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?